On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The sqlalchemy-migrate project is basically maintenance mode and the core > team [1] is kind of a weird mix of people - all great people I'm sure, but I > think it's more a team of people that stepped up when OpenStack took over the > project and said they'd babysit it but it's pretty idle. > > Given we have oslo.db now, and sqlalchemy-migrate is all DB goodies, can we > just have the oslo.db core team [2] own sqlalchemy-migrate now too? > > Here are the sqlalchemy-migrate open reviews: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/186,members > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/331,members If the oslo.db team wants to participate, that’s obviously fine, but I don’t think we want to just add everyone in bulk. AIUI, the team’s goal is to get the migration stuff in oslo.db working with alembic so we can stop using sqlalchemy-migrate. Doug _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev