On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa) <roaga...@cisco.com> wrote: > Agreed. The way I'm thinking about this is that tenants shouldn't care what > the underlying implementation is - L2 or L3. As long as the connectivity > requirements are met using the model/API, end users should be fine. > The data center network design should be an administrators decision based on > the implementation mechanism that has been configured for OpenStack.
Many API users won't care about the L2 details. This could be a compelling alternative for them. However, some do. The L2 details seem to matter an awful lot to many NFV use cases. It might be that this alternative is just not compelling for those. Not to say it isn't compelling overall though. Carl _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
