> On Nov 2, 2014, at 22:21, Dolph Mathews <dolph.math...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, November 2, 2014, John Dennis <jden...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> It was hoped we could simply borrow the Keystone mapping
>> implementation but it was found to be too limiting and not sufficiently
>> expressive. We could not find another alternative so we designed a new
>> mapper which is described in this PDF.
>
> In what way was it too limited? Did you consider extending the existing
> grammar and extending the existing mapping engine?
I am very interested in knowing the limitations you ran into. I am fairly
certain we are willing to update the engine to meet the needs of the deployers,
but knowing what those limitations are and what this new proposed engine
provides that we don't (for this use case) is important.
--Morgan
Sent via mobile
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
