On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:00:04AM +0000, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed in Paris and at today's IRC meeting [1] we are going to be > alternating the time of the weekly IRC meetings to accommodate our > contributors in EMEA better. No time will be perfect for everyone, but as > it stands, we rarely (if ever) see our Indian, Chinese, and Japanese > contributors -- and it's quite hard for any of the AU / NZ folks to attend. > > I'm proposing two sets of times below. Please respond with a "-1" vote to > an option if that option would cause you to miss ALL meetings, or a "+1" > vote if you can magically attend ALL the meetings. If you can attend, > without significant disruption, at least one of the time slots in a > proposal, please do not vote either for or against it. This way we can > identify a proposal which allows everyone to attend at a minimum 50% of the > meetings, and preferentially weight towards one that allows more > contributors to attend two meetings. > > This link shows the local times in some major coutries / timezones around > the world (and you can customize it to add your own). > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20141125&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > For reference, the current meeting time is 1900 UTC. > > Option #1: alternate between Monday 1900 UTC && Tuesday 0900 UTC. I like > this because 1900 UTC spans all of US and western EU, while 0900 combines > EU and EMEA. Folks in western EU are "in the middle" and can attend all > meetings. > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=25&hour=9&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > > Option #2: alternate between Monday 1700 UTC && Tuesday 0500 UTC. I like > this because it shifts the current slot two hours earlier, making it easier > for eastern EU to attend without excluding the western US, and while 0500 > UTC is not so late that US west coast contributors can't attend (it's 9PM > for us), it is harder for western EU folks to attend. There's really no one > in the middle here, but there is at least a chance for US west coast and > EMEA to overlap, which we don't have at any other time. > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 >
+1, I probably won't make all of the 0500 meetings, but will make some. // jim > > I'll collate all the responses to this thread during the week, ahead of > next week's regularly-scheduled meeting. > > -Devananda > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2014/ironic.2014-11-17-19.00.log.html > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev