Rob Basham Cloud Systems Software Architecture 971-344-1999
Tomasz Napierala <tnapier...@mirantis.com> wrote on 11/24/2014 06:42:39 AM: > From: Tomasz Napierala <tnapier...@mirantis.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/24/2014 06:46 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring > > > > On 24 Nov 2014, at 11:09, Sergii Golovatiuk > <sgolovat...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > monasca looks overcomplicated for the purposes we need. Also it > requires Kafka which is Java based transport protocol. What scale are you proposing to support? > > I am proposing Sensu. It's architecture is tiny and elegant. Also > it uses rabbitmq as transport so we won't need to introduce new protocol. We use Sensu on our smaller clouds and really like it there, but it doesn't scale sufficiently for our bigger clouds. > > Do we really need such complicated stuff? Sensu is huge project, and > it's footprint is quite large. Monit can alert using scripts, can we > use it instead of API? I assume you weren't talking about Sensu here and rather about Monasca. I like Monasca for monitoring at large scale. Kafka and Apache Storm are proven technologies at scale. Do you really think you can just pick one monitoring protocol that fits the needs of everybody? Frankly, I'm skeptical of that. > > Regards, > -- > Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala > Sr. OpenStack Engineer > tnapier...@mirantis.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
