Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2014-12-24 03:40:22 -0800: > Hi > > > Ok, I'm quite happy to accept this may be a better long-term solution, but > > can anyone comment on the current maturity level of Mistral? Questions > > which spring to mind are: > > > > - Is the DSL stable now? > > You can think “yes” because although we keep adding new features we do it in > a backwards compatible manner. I personally try to be very cautious about > this. > > > - What's the roadmap re incubation (there are a lot of TBD's here: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mistral/Incubation) > > Ooh yeah, this page is very very obsolete which is actually my fault because > I didn’t pay a lot of attention to this after I heard all these rumors about > TC changing the whole approach around getting projects incubated/integrated. > > I think incubation readiness from a technical perspective is good (various > style checks, procedures etc.), even if there’s still something that we need > to adjust it must not be difficult and time consuming. The main question for > the last half a year has been “What OpenStack program best fits Mistral?”. So > far we’ve had two candidates: Orchestration and some new program (e.g. > Workflow Service). However, nothing is decided yet on that. >
It's probably worth re-thinking the discussion above given the governance changes that are being worked on: http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.html _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
