> What you’re saying is that whatever is under “$.env” is just the exact same > environment that we passed when we started the workflow? If yes then it > definitely makes sense to me (it just allows to explicitly access > environment, not through the implicit variable lookup). Please confirm.
Yes. the $.env that I original proposed would be the same dict as the one supplied at start_workflow. Although we have to agree whether the variables in the environment are allowed to change after the WF started. Unless there's a valid use case, I would lean toward making env immutable. > One thing that I strongly suggest is that we clearly define all reserved keys like “env”, “__actions” etc. I think it’d be better if they all started with the same prefix, for example, double underscore. Agree. How about using double underscore for env as well (i.e. $.__env.var1, $.__env.var2)?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
