Hi, Puppet OpenStack community uses Beaker for acceptance testing. I would consider it as option [2]
[2] https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobre...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hello. > > We are working on the modularization of Openstack deployment by puppet > manifests in Fuel library [0]. > > Each deploy step should be post-verified with some testing framework as > well. > > I believe the framework should: > * be shipped as a part of Fuel library for puppet manifests instead of > orchestration or Nailgun backend logic; > * allow the deployer to verify results right in-place, at the node being > deployed, for example, with a rake tool; > * be compatible / easy to integrate with the existing orchestration in > Fuel and Mistral as an option? > > It looks like test resources provided by Serverspec [1] are a good > option, what do you think? > > What plans have Fuel Nailgun team for testing the results of deploy > steps aka tasks? The spec for blueprint gives no a clear answer. > > [0] > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization > [1] http://serverspec.org/resource_types.html > > -- > Best regards, > Bogdan Dobrelya, > Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com > Irc #bogdando > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
