Sean,
I definitely like the direction that gabbi seems to be headed. It feels > like a much cleaner version of what nova tried to do with API samples. > As long as multiple projects think this is an interesting direction, I > think it's probably fine to add it to global-requirements and let them > start working with it. +1 more testing better code. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 01/12/2015 03:11 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > Thanks for this Chris, I'm hoping to get my fingers dirty with it Real > > Soon Now. > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Eoghan Glynn <egl...@redhat.com > > <mailto:egl...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > I'd be interested in hearing the api-wg viewpoint, specifically > whether > > that working group intends to recommend any best practices around the > > approach to API testing. > > > > > > Testing recommendations haven't been part of the conversation yet, but I > > think it is within scope for the WG to have some opinions on REST API > > design and validation tools. > > I definitely like the direction that gabbi seems to be headed. It feels > like a much cleaner version of what nova tried to do with API samples. > > As long as multiple projects think this is an interesting direction, I > think it's probably fine to add it to global-requirements and let them > start working with it. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
