+1 for Doug

2015-01-20 13:59 GMT+09:00 Aaron Rosen <aaronoro...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin <c...@ecbaldwin.net> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote:
>> > The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
>> > looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the
>> > core
>> > team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so
>> > we
>> > need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period
>> > [2]
>> > indicate some changes are needed for core reviewers who are no longer
>> > reviewing on pace with the other core reviewers.
>> >
>> > First of all, I'm removing Sumit Naiksatam from neutron-core. Sumit has
>> > been
>> > a core reviewer for a long time, and his past contributions are very
>> > much
>> > thanked by the entire OpenStack Neutron team. If Sumit jumps back in
>> > with
>> > thoughtful reviews in the future, we can look at getting him back as a
>> > Neutron core reviewer. But for now, his stats indicate he's not
>> > reviewing at
>> > a level consistent with the rest of the Neutron core reviewers.
>> >
>> > As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron
>> > core reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only all
>> > the
>> > Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and
>> > work
>> > in the services split in December were the reason we were so successful
>> > in
>> > making that happen. Doug has also been instrumental in the Neutron LBaaS
>> > V2
>> > rollout, as well as helping to merge code in the other neutron service
>> > repositories.
>> >
>> > I'd also like to take this time to remind everyone that reviewing code
>> > is a
>> > responsibility, in Neutron the same as other projects. And core
>> > reviewers
>> > are especially beholden to this responsibility. I'd also like to point
>> > out
>> > that +1/-1 reviews are very useful, and I encourage everyone to continue
>> > reviewing code even if you are not a core reviewer.
>> >
>> > Existing neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the addition of Doug to
>> > the
>> > core team.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Kyle
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/051986.html
>> > [2] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/neutron-reviewers-90.txt
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Akihiro Motoki <amot...@gmail.com>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to