On 01/29/2015 07:17 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Everett Toews wrote: > > A couple of important topics came up as a result of attending the > > Cross Project Meeting. I’ve added both to the agenda for the next > > meeting on Thursday 2015/01/29 at 16:00 UTC. > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda > > > > The first is the suggestion from ttx to consider using > > openstack-specs [1] for the API guidelines. > > Precision: my suggestion was to keep the api-wg repository for the > various drafting stages, and move to openstack-specs when it's ready to > be "recommended" and request wider community comments. Think Draft and > RFC stages in the IETF process :) > > > Oh, thanks for clarifying, I hadn't understood it that way. > > To me, it seems more efficient to get votes and iterate in one repo > rather than going through two iterations and two review groups. What do > others think? > Thanks, > Anne
Honestly, I'm more a fan of the one repository approach. Jumping
repositories means the history gets lost, and you have to restart a
bunch of conversations. That happened in the logging jump from nova ->
openstack-specs, which probably created 3 - 4 months additional delay in
the process.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
