Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800: > Hi, > > I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the > identity_uri. > > I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the > information in a single directive, which means that a script that would > edit it would need a lot more parsing work than simply a key/value pair > logic. This is error prone. The fragments don't have this issue. > > So, could we decide to: > 1/ Not remove the auth fragments > 2/ Remove the deprecation warnings >
Automation has tended away from parsing and editting files in place for a long time now. Typically you'd have a source of truth with all the values, and a tool to turn that into a URL during file generation. This isn't error prone in my experience. I don't really know why the single URL is preferred, but I don't think the argument that "it makes parsing and editting the config file with external tools" is strong enough to roll this deprecation back. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
