----- Original Message ----- > Has there been any work to use conntrack synchronization similar to L3 HA in > DVR so failover is fast on the SNAT node? >
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139686/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143169/ These changes have taken a back seat to improving the DVR job reliability and L3 agent refactoring. Michael and Rajeev could expand. > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Carl Baldwin < [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 10, 2015 2:36 AM, "Wilence Yao" < [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > After OpenStack Juno, floating ip is handled by dvr, but SNAT is still > > handled by l3agent on network node. The distributed SNAT is in future > > plans for DVR. In my opinion, SNAT can move to DVR as well as floating ip. > > I have searched in blueprint, there is little about distributed SNAT. Is > > there any different between distributed floating ip and distributed SNAT? > > The difference is that a shared snat address is shared among instances on > multiple compute nodes. A floating ip is exclusive to a single instance on > one compute node. I'm interested to hear your ideas for distributing it. > > Carl > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > -- > Kevin Benton > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
