On 25 February 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2015-02-24 11:27:05 +0000 (+0000), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > [...] >> It would be reasonable for the vulnerability team to take the decision >> that they'll support fixes for master, and any branches that the stable >> team decide to support. > [...] > > Well, it's worth noting that the VMT doesn't even "support" (i.e. > issue advisories for bugs in) master branches now, the exception > being branchless projects where the bug appears in master prior to > an existing release tag. > > But I think Thierry's earlier point is that as soon as you start > marking _some_ releases as special (supported by VMT, stable maint, > docs, translators...) then those become your new actual releases and > the other interim releases become your milestones, and we're back to > the current model again.
I don't think thats true actually. We'd still have a major smoothing effect on work, which means less high peaks at release time and less troughs at 'review direction' time and so on. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
