On 01:15 Thu 12 Mar , Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Also, can > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647/2> > be considered. all it does is move code from the accepted nfs.py to posix.py > as described in the approved spec. This enables all posix complient file > systems to be used, such as lustre instead of just nfs. It is already tested > through the nfs tests.
I would rather review resources be spent on approving the back log of bugs we have submitted. That's what this time is spent for. There's no reason this can't wait for Liberty. > The posix backup driver has been cooking in one form or another since Juno. > It would be a shame to need to wait over a year and a half for it. Technically this will be in October, which is not a year and a half. More than happy to review in L-1. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
