On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Jan Provazník <jprov...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/18/2015 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> So is this eventually going to live in Tuskar? If so, I would point out >> that it's going to be awkward to move it there if it starts out as a >> separate thing. There's no good way I know of to copy code from one git >> repo to another without losing its history. >> >> I guess my main thing is that everyone seems to agree we need to do >> this, so it's not like we're testing the viability of a new project. >> I'd rather put this code in the right place up front than have to mess >> around with moving it later. That said, this is kind of outside my >> purview so I don't want to hold things up, I just want to make sure >> we've given some thought to where it lives. >> >> -Ben >> > > Hi, > I don't have a strong opinion where this lib should live. James, as TripleO > PTL, what is your opinion about the lib location? > > For now, I set WIP on the patch which adds this lib into Stackforge [1] > (which I sent shortly before Ben pointed out the concern about its > location). > > Jan > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165433/
I'd say just propose it under openstack/ for all the afore mentioned reasons. We might as well start when we intend to end up, especially since Tuskar API is already under openstack/. If anyone ends up surfacing any objections, that will become known on the review. -- -- James Slagle -- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
