Hi, > In one of the Ironic IRC meetings, a discussion on whether to retain the > ‘Chassis’ element in Ironic or not came up. > > I am interested to know whether this is still valid and a decision is to be > made on whether the component is retained or not. >
Even tho the Chassis resource in our API is not being very used, right now the only thing it does is to group nodes*, one thing is: We can't simply remove it from the v1 API so, it will be there. For future versions of the API maybe we can group nodes differently, using a label for example. But we don't have plans for a new version of the API yet and v1 will still be supported for some time. * We could use Chassis for more things, multi-node actions. Cheers, Lucas __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
