++

Same here.

From: Marek Denis [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][FFE] ECP wrapped assertions

Hi,

I strongly support this request.
On 23.03.2015 22:42, Steve Martinelli wrote:
I'd like to request an exemption for the following to go into the Kilo release.

This work is crucial for:
-  Keystone to Keystone communication. An ECP wrapped SAML assertion will make 
it much easier for consumers and clients to use the K2K feature in Keystone. 
Currently, a client must take the generated SAML response and must prepare the 
ECP envelope themselves. This should be handled by Keystone, and not the 
clients. The client should be able to ask for the ECP wrapped assertion and 
hand it off to another Keystone.

Why this needs an FFE?
- To properly created an ECP wrapped a SAML assertion, a relay state property 
must be known, (as it's used to compute a value in an ECP specific field). This 
depends on how the service provider has their mod_shib configured. We will need 
to add a new property to the keystone resource 'service provider' - the spec 
change is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166086/

Status of the work:
- The patches necessary for this feature already and split into two patches. 1) 
To add a new relay_state_prefix property to the service provider resource: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166078/ and 2) to actually use this new 
property in order to generate the ECP assertion: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162866/

Thanks,

Steve Martinelli
OpenStack Keystone Core


Marek Denis
OpenStack Keystone Core
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to