Can we keep it consistent ? The APIs have meter in them, so do the CLIs so we should really stick to that convention.
If Gnocchi is using metrics, I feel it should change to use meters or a V3 API proposed that changes it all. Projects and Tenants still cause such massive confusion for the end user, let's not do it again. Saying they are equivalent does not stop the confusion and support effort when people say that the form allows them to create a project but they want a tenant. Tim From: gordon chung [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 24 March 2015 18:41 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meters vs. Metrics tbh, i've been using them interchangeably -- i don't know if they are logically different. i believe gnocchi uses 'metric' term while current api uses 'meter' so we don't really have a common usage in api either. if i were to choose one, i'd lean more to using 'metric'. cheers, gord > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:43:51 +0800 > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > To: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meters vs. Metrics > > All, > I observed various "meters" and "metrics" with almost same meaning in > telemetry > part of admin-guild-cloud. > > Just curious about the minor difference. If they are interchangeable, we can > pick up one for confusion. > > > > Best Rgds, > Edwin > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
