Quoting Morgan Fainberg (2015-04-04 02:55:59) > I am looking forward to the Liberty cycle and seeing the special casing we do > for SQLite in our migrations (and elsewhere). My inclination is that we should > (similar to the deprecation of eventlet) deprecate support for SQLite in > Keystone. In Liberty we will have a full functional test suite that can (and > will) be used to validate everything against much more real environments > instead of in-process ?eventlet-like? test-keystone-services; the ?Restful > test > cases? will no longer be part of the standard unit tests (as they are > functional testing). With this change I?m inclined to say SQLite (being the > non-production usable DB) what it is we should look at dropping migration > support for SQLite and the custom work-arounds. > > Most deployers and developers (as far as I know) use devstack and MySQL or > Postgres to really suss out DB interactions. > > I am looking for feedback from the community on the general stance for SQLite, > and more specifically the benefit (if any) of supporting it in Keystone. > > -- > Morgan Fainberg
+1 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
