I have a Neutron DHCP agent patch whose purpose is to launch dnsmasq with options such that it works (=> provides DHCP service) for TAP interfaces that are _not_ bridged to the DHCP interface (ns-XXX). For the sake of being concrete, this involves:

- creating the ns-XXX interface as a dummy, instead of as a veth pair

- launching dnsmasq with --bind-dynamic --listen=ns-XXX --listen=tap* --bridge-interface=ns-XXX,tap*

- not running in a separate namespace

- running the DHCP agent on every compute host, instead of only on the network node

- using the relevant subnet's gateway IP on the ns-XXX interface (on every host), instead of allocating a different IP for each ns-XXX interface.

I proposed a spec for this in the Kilo cycle [1], but it didn't get enough traction, and I'm now wondering what to do with this work/function. Specifically, whether to look again at integrating it into Neutron during the Liberty cycle, or whether to maintain an independent DHCP agent for my project outside the upstream Neutron tree. I would very much appreciate any comments or advice on this.

For answering that last question, I suspect the biggest factor is whether routed TAP interfaces - i.e. forms of networking implementation that rely on routing data between VMs instead of bridging it - is in scope for Neutron, at all. If it is, I understand that there could be a lot more detail to work on, such as how it meshes with other Neutron features such as DVR and the IPAM work, and that it might end up being quite different from the blueprint linked below. But it would be good to know whether this would ultimately be in scope and of interest for Neutron at all.

Please do let me now what you think.

Many thanks,    
        Neil

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dhcp-for-routed-ifs

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to