On 05/01/2015 02:22 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > The spec review process has made it much easier for operators to see > what is being proposed and give input. > > Recognition is a different topic. It also comes into who would be the > operator/user electorate ? ATC is simple to define where the equivalent > operator/user definition is less clear.
I think spec review participation is a great example of where it would make sense to grant extra ATC status. If someone provides valuable spec input, but hasn't made any commits that get ATC status, I'd vote to approve their ATC status if proposed. -- Russell Bryant __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
