On 3 June 2015 at 12:52, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/03/2015 02:34 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> >> On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote: >> >>> I'm wondering though whether the current API behaviour here should be >>> changed more generally. Is there a plausible reason to silently >>> discard options that are not allowed for non-admins? For me it would >>> make more sense to return an error in that case. >> >> >> If we're bumping the microversion anyways, I'd be in favor of having >> that throw an error rather than silently ignore options. >> >> You could maybe even have a helpful "those options require admin >> privileges" error message that gets displayed to the user. > > ++
+1 We must keep adding this sort of validation as we evolve v2.1 This is a one of the big changes in the "default behaviour" since v2.0, validate input, and make things discoverable, rather than silently fail. Thanks, John __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
