On 2015-06-04 02:01:25 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: > FYI, I'm also for having a separate namespace, just because adding more > than 150 Git repositories at once in /openstack will be a huge mess. [...]
Simply from an infra standpoint there's no real distinction. We only ended up with that extra level of namespaces originally so we could match repo names up to the org structure imposed by Github. I and many others would love to just get rid of our current git namespaces entirely, so I'd prefer not to go adding new ones. A repo is a repo from the standpoint of Gerrit and the rest of our infrastructure, and the part of the name before the / is mostly arbitrary (and becoming more and more so with the Big Tent). -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
