On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:06:29AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at > the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2]. > > I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and we're down to at > least one screen of changes now [3]. > > My thinking was once we've processed that list, i.e. either approved what > we're going to approve or -2 what we aren't, then we should proceed with > doing the icehouse-eol tag and deleting the branch. > > Is everyone generally in agreement with doing this soon? If so, then I'm > thinking target a week from today for the stable maint core team to scrub > the list of open reviews in the next week and we then get the infra team to > tag the branch and close it out.
Not really a surprise, but I support doing this soon. Next week seems fine to me. > > The only open question I have is if we need to do an Icehouse point release > prior to the tag and dropping the branch, but I don't think that's happened > in the past with branch end of life - the eol tag basically serves as the > placeholder to the last 'release'. I don't think we need to do a point release, there will be the icehouse-eol tag which will mark the same thing. But, even if we later decide to add a point release to mark the same thing it is trivial to push another tag for the same sha1. > > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-May/065144.html > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-relmgt-stable-branch > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:stable/icehouse,n,z > -Matt Treinish
pgp0XpfsPKAOn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev