On 8 June 2015 at 16:48, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2015-06-08 10:54:32 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: >> On 8 June 2015 at 10:14, Alan Pevec <ape...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 2015-06-06 19:08 GMT+02:00 Ian Cordasco <ian.corda...@rackspace.com>: >> >> Not exactly. PBR/OpenStack follow SemVer and 2015.1.0.38 isn't valid >> >> SemVer (http://semver.org/) >> > >> > Right, so semver compatible versioning on stable/kilo would be 2015.1.N >> > but PBR doesn't support that. >> >> PBR supports it fine. Whats the issue? > > Having PBR automatically increment the N in 2015.1.N for each patch > applied on the branch rather than needing it to be tagged.
This breaks the desire of wanting to have a shared version scheme if consumers add their own local patches via git. This works fine for consumers that do not use git for handling their local patches, but does not support the model of allowing the user to rebase using git. Perhaps tags ARE superior for this? -- Kind Regards, Dave Walker __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
