Yes, that's the official position - "Avoid mox, use mock, worst case use mox3 for existing"
-- dims On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com> wrote: > Hi, > Shouldn't we move to use mock instead ? If mox3 is supported and active, why > would we recommend to use mock ? > > Jordan > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Oslo folks, everyone, >> >> mox3 needs to be maintained since some of our projects use it and we >> have it in our global requirements. >> >> Here's the proposal from Doug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190330/ >> >> Any objections? Please chime in here or on the review. >> >> thanks, >> dims >> >> -- >> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
