On 6/15/15, 16:24, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@debian.org> wrote:
>On 06/15/2015 05:19 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> On 6/15/15, 09:24, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@debian.org> wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2015 01:55 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: >>>> One thing I like about plan D >>>> is that it would give also indicator how much the stable branch has >>>> moved in >>>> each individual project. >>> >>> The only indication you will get is how many patches it has. I fail to >>> see how this is valuable information. No info on how important they are >>> or anything of this kind, which is a way more important. >>> >>> Thomas >> >> Are you implying that stable point releases as they exist today provide >> importance? How is that case? > >I'm just replying to Kuvaja, Erno, who pretends that plan D will give >"indicator how much the stable branch has moved in". My answer is: not >it wont. Maybe there was lots of cosmetic patches (like typos, man page, >or who knows...). The number of patch is an indication of ... nothing, >really! > >The only way to have indications is release notes. Since it looks like >there's not enough resources to write them, we're giving up on them. >It's really a shame, because I'm sure it was valuable for our users. > >Thomas I would suggest you read the section of the wiki that describes what is an appropriate commit to land on a stable branch: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Appropriate_Fixes __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
