On 6 July 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-07-06 11:54:45 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote: > [...] > > For what I can tell, Joe was kind to set the infra to start > > gathering data on the reliability of the multi-node jobs, but they > > are clearly flaky [1], and currently broken. > [...] > > Well, a check-.* pass rate of 25% is likely explained by running > against proposed bad changes (after all these are running in the > check pipeline, not the gate). The recent 100% failure we think will > be fixed with a new release of glean incorporating > https://review.openstack.org/198576 since we recently started > exceeding the 64-byte HOST_NAME_MAX on our test platforms. >
Thanks for the heads-up, Jeremy. That said, the rate is still remarkably higher as a like-for-like comparison. I don't think we have a way to compare the rate on the gate pipeline, if I am not mistaken, but that's besides the point of my attempt at reviving this discussion. Cheers, Armando > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
