Hi Mike, Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest python-cinderclient review request to get more stats.
Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ [1] http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer, http://blog.e0ne.info/, http://notacash.com/, http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Mike Perez <thin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21:48 Jul 06, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > <snip> > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > > every patch to python-cinderclient? > > I'm fine with this as long as the job has been stable since it was > introduced > as experimental. You mind posting the stats? > > -- > Mike Perez > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev