Well FWIW I think that that should go ahead: we have no constraints mechanism to keep to known-good versions for kilo, and the minimum version bump was explains in the requirements repo when it was proposed.
On 14 July 2015 at 17:10, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > what's the status of patches like this? > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173834/ > > we still haven't decided how to handle that? > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
