OK, get it. -Yingxin
From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:t...@styra.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 11:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Need reviews of bp rpc-for-dse Hi Yingxin, We definitely want details for what you have in mind. In case you haven't done this before, we write a 'spec' to explain the details. Here's some info on how to do that. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Congress#How_To_Propose_a_New_Feature Tim On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:13 AM Cheng, Yingxin <yingxin.ch...@intel.com<mailto:yingxin.ch...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi all, I have some thoughts about congress dse improvement after having read the code for several days. Please refer to bp/rpc-for-dse<https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/rpc-for-dse>, its idea is to implement RPC in deepsix. Congress can benefit from lower-coupling between dse services. And the steps towards oslo-messaging integration can be milder too. Eager to learn everything from Community. Anything wrong, please kindly point it out. Thank you Yingxin __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
