On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:57:01AM -0500, Michael Still wrote: > In fact, I did an example of what I thought it would look like already: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205154/ > > I welcome discussion on this, especially from people who couldn't make > it to the mid-cycle. Its up to y'all if you do that on this thread or > in that review.
I think this kind of thing needs to have a spec proposed for it, so we can go through the details of the problem and the design considerations for it. This is especially true considering this proposal comes out of a f2f meeting where the majority of the community was not present to participate in the discussion. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
