Greetings, The issue [1] looks like a feature to me. I'd move it to next release. Let's focus on what's important right now - stability.
Thanks, Igor [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779 On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since the feature is essential, and changes are small, we can accept it as > a, > feature freeze exceptions. > > But as far as I know there is a very important ticket [1] which was created > in > order to get patches merged faster, also I still have concerns regarding to > ERB style template "<% if3 %>" which is in fact Jinja. So it's not only > about > fixes in the client. > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779 > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> > wrote: >> >> Looks like the only CLI part left: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/, and you guys did a great job >> finishing the other two. >> >> Looks like we'd need to give FF exception, as this is essential feature. >> It's glad that we merged all other thousands lines of code. This is the most >> complex feature, and seems like the only small thing is left. >> >> I'd like to hear feedback from Nailgun cores & fuel client SMEs. For me, >> it seems it is lower risk, and patch is relatively small. How long would it >> take to complete it? If it takes a couple of days, then it is fine. If it is >> going to take week or two, then we will have to have it as a risk for HCF >> deadline. Spending resources on features now, not on bugs, means less >> quality or slip of the release. >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM Aleksey Kasatkin <akasat...@mirantis.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Team, >>> >>> I would like to request an exception from the Feature Freeze for >>> "Templates for Networking" feature [1]. >>> >>> Exception is required for two CRs to python-fuelclient: [2],[3] and one >>> CR to fuel-web (Nailgun): [4]. >>> These CRs are for adding ability to create/remove networks via API [4] >>> and for supporting new API functionality via CLI. >>> These patchsets are for adding new templates-related functionality and >>> they do not change existing functionality. >>> Patchsets [3],[4] are in deep review and they will hopefully be merged on >>> Thursday. >>> >>> Please, respond if you have any questions or concerns related to this >>> request. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/templates-for-networking >>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/ >>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203602/ >>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201217/ >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Aleksey Kasatkin >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> -- >> Mike Scherbakov >> #mihgen >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev