Barbican depends on Keystone though for authentication. Its not a silver bullet 
here.

Kevin
________________________________
From: Dolph Mathews [dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 10:53 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

Although using a node's *local* filesystem requires external configuration 
management to manage the distribution of rotated keys, it's always available, 
easy to secure, and can be updated atomically per node. Note that Fernet's 
rotation strategy uses a staged key that can be distributed to all nodes in 
advance of it being used to create new tokens.

Also be aware that you wouldn't want to store encryption keys in plaintext in a 
shared database, so you must introduce an additional layer of complexity to 
solve that problem.

Barbican seems like much more logical next-step beyond the local filesystem, as 
it shifts the burden onto a system explicitly designed to handle this issue 
(albeit in a multitenant environment).

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Alexander Makarov 
<amaka...@mirantis.com<mailto:amaka...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Greetings!

I'd like to discuss pro's and contra's of having Fernet encryption keys stored 
in a database backend.
The idea itself emerged during discussion about synchronizing rotated keys in 
HA environment.
Now Fernet keys are stored in the filesystem that has some availability issues 
in unstable cluster.
OTOH, making SQL highly available is considered easier than that for a 
filesystem.

--
Kind Regards,
Alexander Makarov,
Senior Software Developer,

Mirantis, Inc.
35b/3, Vorontsovskaya St., 109147, Moscow, Russia

Tel.: +7 (495) 640-49-04<tel:%2B7%20%28495%29%20640-49-04>
Tel.: +7 (926) 204-50-60<tel:%2B7%20%28926%29%20204-50-60>

Skype: MAKAPOB.AJIEKCAHDP

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to