Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-30 15:27:15 +0000: > > On 7/29/15, 1:23 PM, "Doug Hellmann" <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > > >Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-29 20:07:26 +0000: > >> Doug Hellman of the TC suggested we change the mission statement of > >>Kolla to be a little less specific. The new mission statement I > >>submitted in the review is here Is basically cutting off the last part > >>of the mission statement sentence: > >> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206789/ > >> > >> If your a Kolla core eviewer, please vote 1 (indicating you are a core > >>reviewer in the review) if you dislike this change and think we should > >>strive to keep our mission unchanged. If you don¹t really have a strong > >>preference, please abstain from voting as to not add non-useful > >>information to the review. Our core team knows what our true mission is > >>and I don¹t think Doug¹s wording changes the mission significantly. > > > >My intent is not to change it at all, but to remove the "marketing > >fluff", to be consistent with the nature of the missions described > >by most of the other projects. By all means, hold to those other > >ideals and goals, but in the project list we want the mission to > >say what you're doing as clearly and concisely as possible. > > > >Doug > > Doug, > > Its all good, I think the change you suggested simplifies the statement > without changing the intent. We can still do all those other things as > you just indicated if we choose to. > > I still want to give the core reviewer team an opportunity to vote on the > change which is why I set the short deadline of Aug 3rd to vote -1 (and > act as a veto vote) which would trigger irc meetings to rework the mission > statement.
Sure, having the team vote & comment is absolutely appropriate, I just wanted to clarify the reasons for the change. :-) > Thanks for the good feedback, I actually think the modified mission > statement is faster to say which is always a good thing :) ++ Doug > > Regards > -steve > > > > >> > >> I¹ll keep the schedule open until August 3rd and ask the TC to hold off > >>on approving the submitted mission until the core team has not weighed > >>in with a 1 vote. A vote of 1 will count as a veto from the core > >>reviewer team, and we will have to have some kind of super-brainstorming > >>session like we did before to simplify the Kolla mission statement to > >>something the TC would accept. > >> > >> Regards > >> -steve > > > >__________________________________________________________________________ > >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev