On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 08:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-08-05 15:04:15 +0000 (+0000), Ian Cordasco wrote: > > One point of clarification. Not every project has to opt into > > global-requirements so this isn't necessarily true. Also with the > > merging of the stackforge and openstack namespaces, it'll be > > harder to distinguish when a project is or isn't using g-r since > > in the past it was fairly safe to assume that stackforge/ projects > > were more likely to not use g-r. > > Agreed, this used to be a (perhaps not well-documented) necessity > for repos which were in or dependencies of the integrated release. > Now that we've dissolved more of those arbitrary distinctions, this > seems like a great opportunity for tracking with a governance tag. > I'll go ahead and propose one later today if I get a spare moment. > We already track it in the requirements repo itself [0]. Not sure if we need an additional tracking method.
[0] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/projects.txt Clark __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev