On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
If someone installs aodh on a machine that already has ceilometer on it
and turns off ceilometer-alarm-notifier and ceilometer-alarm-evaluator
(in favor of aodh-notifier and aodh-evaluator) will they be able to run
those aodh services against their existing ceilometer.conf files[2]?
Yes, because none of the option has been changed, and those who have
been changed have been deprecated, e.g. deprecated_group=foobar.
Excellent, glad to hear it.
What if they were, in ceilometer, using specific config for their
alarming database (alarm_connection). Can aodh "see" and use this
config option?
That's the only option where maybe I cleaned-up a little bit too much as
I think I remove the alarm_connection from Aodh. I'll cook a patch to
fix that.
Glad we flushed that out[1].
We could test that upgrade path using Grenade maybe?
Yes[2]. We'd have to instrument how wanted to manage both the
installation of aodh and the config, but one of the advantages of
having grenade as a plugin would be that we can do what we need to
do (to some extent).
I hope I made things clearer!
Yes, thanks very much. IRC is dismal enough for reasoned discussion and
resolution but even worse for ensuring decisions have lasting and visible
effect.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210286/
[2] Assuming we can get the various pieces to fall into place so
that we have working grenade plugins in all the right places.
--
Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent
https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
