Kyle, I can speak very little about the QoS branch, but from what I gather it is mature enough to be merged back. However, I believe the Pecan work is still incomplete as we need a solution to run the RPC over AMQP server independently. Once we have that we can start merging back what we have.
Salvatore On 8 August 2015 at 04:39, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > As we're beginning to wind down Liberty-3 in a few weeks, I'd like to > present the rough, high level plan to merge back the QoS and pecan branches > into Neutron. Ihar has been doing a great job shepherding the QoS work, and > I believe once we're done landing the final patches this weekend [1], we > can look to merge this branch back next week. > > The pecan branch [2] has a few patches left, but it's also my > understanding from prior patches we'll need some additional testing done. > Kevin, what else is left here? I'd like to see if we could merge this > branch back the following week. I'd also like to hear your comments on > enabling the pecan WSGI layer by default for Liberty and what additional > testing is needed (if any) to make that happen. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > [1] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron+branch:feature/qos+status:open,n,z > [2] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron+branch:feature/pecan+status:open,n,z > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev