Hello Anita, Thank you for the email and for checking into the Postman open ness! There might be some mis-comunication here. Postman is not an official part of the project and never will be. Neither will any non-open source code base. As mentioned in the IRC logs, I personally like to perform additional manual tests of APIs when doing code reviews. I use both curl and also sometimes find the Postman browser plugin to be helpful, so was sharing that with others who might use it. If you do already have an open source browser plugin that has similar functionality I would very much like to take advantage of it for my personal testing, because you are certainly right that we don’t want to seem as thought we are endorsing non-open tool sets!
Thank you! Travis On 8/10/15, 5:34 PM, "Anita Kuno" <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >On 08/10/2015 06:28 PM, Tripp, Travis S wrote: >> At our last weekly IRC meeting we decided that we should have a short video >> conference meetup to talk about the Liberty 3 release. The purpose will be >> to walk through the Liberty Blueprints / Bugs and finalize the list for >> Liberty 3. I promised to create a doodle poll for choosing the time, so here >> it is: >> >> http://doodle.com/99kzigdbmed57g7s >> >> Please note, one time I set is the same time as the normal IRC meeting. If >> that is what works best for everybody, we’ll start the IRC meeting normally, >> but share a video link in the meeting room for people to join. >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >Hello: > >Part of being an OpenStack project listed in the governance repo, as you >are [0], is agreeing to conduct your business in an open manner. Had you >not done so prior to now I would not have known that you are using >Postman for testing [1], as you linked in your meeting log [2]. If >Postman is open source licensed I couldn't find it in their >documentation [3]. > >Now I'm certainly not going to waste my time telling you how you should >operate your project. I am simply going to take the time to tell you >that currently your tool choices aren't in keeping with the 4 opens [4]. >If this is by design, power to you, and please don't let me hold you back. > >If this is by accident and you really do want to ensure you stay an >OpenStack project, do reach out to a member of the technical committee >as I feel you could benefit from some tool choice and workflow guidance. > >Thank you, >Anita. > > >[0] >http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml#n2011 >[1] https://www.getpostman.com/collections/8c0b1e05875c7c58e967 >[2] >http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-08-06-15.01.log.html >[3] https://www.getpostman.com/docs >[4] >http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/new-projects-requirements.rst#n17 > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
