Hi, Could you provide the link to this code? On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Pradeep Kilambi <pkila...@redhat.com> wrote:
> We're in the process of converting existing meters to use a more > declarative approach where we add the meter definition as part of a yaml. > As part of this transition there are few notification handlers where the id > is not consistent. For example, in profiler notification Handler the > resource_id is set to "profiler-%s" % message["payload"]["base_id"] . Is > there a reason we have the prefix? Can we ignore this and directly set > to message["payload"]["base_id"] ? Seems like there is no real need for the > prefix here unless i'm missing something. Can we go ahead and drop this? > > If we don't hear anything i'll assume there is no objection to dropping > this prefix. > > > Thanks, > > -- > -- > Pradeep Kilambi; irc: prad > OpenStack Engineering > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
