Hi Tim
We use fixed count of columns. So I believe there should not be any bad
impact of this change.
Regards
Filip
On 08/18/2015 11:22 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Hi all,
We're contemplating a small syntax change in the Congress policy
language and wanted to see if it would cause anyone problems.
Currently you can write rules that give a single table differing
numbers of columns. In the following example, the 'error' table has
both 1 column and 2 columns.
error(vm) :- blah blah
error(vm, net) :- blah blah
We're contemplating removing this flexibility and making every table
have a fixed number of columns. (We only support differing numbers of
columns in very special cases anyway.)
Would this cause any problems? Murano team?
Thanks,
Tim
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
