On 8/19/2015 2:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:


On 8/19/2015 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:


On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need
microversion bump which is fine
however, another concern raised on whether we need combine a set of
those kind of changes (which may only change some error code) into one
bump ?

apparently there are pros and cons for doing so, combine makes API
version bump not that frequent for minor changes
but makes it hard to review and backport ... so any suggestions on how
to handle ? Thanks


[1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198753/
[2]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173985/

Best Regards!

Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨

Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL
Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM@IBMCN   Internet: jiche...@cn.ibm.com
Phone: +86-10-82454158
Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian
District, Beijing 100193, PRC


__________________________________________________________________________


OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


I don't see why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198753/ would require a
microversion bump.  We've always allowed handling 500s and turning them
into more appropriate error codes, like a 400 in this case.

As noted:

http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/evaluating_api_changes.html



"Changing an error response code to be more accurate." is generally
acceptable.


https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173985/ doesn't require a version bump
for the same reasons, IMO.  If people are hung up on 400 vs 403 in that
change, just make it a 400, we do it both ways in the compute API.


I guess the problems are in the doc:

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/doc/source/api_microversion_dev.rst#n63

  - the list of status codes allowed for a particular request

    Example: an API previously could return 200, 400, 403, 404 and the
    change would make the API now also be allowed to return 409.

  - changing a status code on a particular response

    Example: changing the return code of an API from 501 to 400.

So in the one change, just return 400. In the service_get change where you want to return a 400 but it's only returning a 404 today, then I guess according to the doc you'd need a microversion bump. But what do we do about fixing that bug in the v2 API? Do we not fix it? Do we return 404 but v2.1 would return 400 with a microversion bump? That's equally inconsistent and gross IMO.

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to