On 08/21/2015 03:37 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-08-21 14:32:50 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote: >> Personally I would recommend that the election officials have >> verification permissions on the proposed repo and the automation >> step is skipped to begin with as a way of expediting the repo >> creation. Getting the workflow in place in enough time that >> potential candidates can familiarize themselves with the change, >> is of primary importance I feel. Automation can happen after the >> workflow is in place. > > Agreed, I'm just curious what our options actually are for > automating the confirmation research currently performed. It's > certainly not a prerequisite for using the new repo/workflow in a > manually-driven capacity in the meantime. >
Fair enough. I don't want to answer the question myself as I feel it's best for the response to come from current election officials. Thanks Jeremy, Anita. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
