Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 25/08/15 06:01 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Morgan, >> >> Bit more radical :) I am inclined to just yank all code from >> oslo-incubator and >> let the projects modify/move what they have left into their own >> package/module >> structure (and change the contracts however they see fit). > > Glad this conversation is happening, I've started to think about this > as well. I think we're at a point were we could just let projects move > from were they are. > > However, I'd like this to be a bit more organized. For instance, if we > dismiss oslo-incubator and let projects move forward on their own, > it'd be better to have all the `openstack/common/` packages renamed so > that it'll create less confusion to newcomers. At the very least, as > Morgan mentioned, these packages could be prefixed with an `_` and > become 'private' and 'owned' by the project. > > We still need a 'deprecation' process for the code in the > oslo-incubator repository and we would still have to accept fixes for > previous releases.
The Death of the Incubator. Sounds like a great thing to discuss at the Design Summit. I don't think we would kill it before start of Mitaka anyway ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
