On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote: > This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in > Ceilometer with ... something: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/ > > This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in > controller code that is inscrutable. > > The problem with the spec is that it doesn't know what to replace > WSME with. > > So, for your Friday afternoon pleasure I invite anyone with an > opinion to hold forth on what framework they would choose. The spec > lists a few options but please feel to not limit yourself to those. > > If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you > have specific comments on the spec please response there.
For Gnocchi we've been relying on voluptuous¹ for data validation, and Pecan as the rest of the framework – like what's used in Ceilometer and consors. I find it a pretty good option, more Pythonic than JSON Schema – which has its pros and cons too. What I'm not happy with is actually Pecan, as I find the routing system way too much complex in the end. I think I'd prefer to go with something like Flask finally. > P.S: An option not listed, and one that may make perfect sense for > ceilometer (but perhaps not aodh), is to do nothing and consider the > v2 api "legacy". This is going to happen in a few cycles I hope for Ceilometer. ¹ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/voluptuous -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
