El 04/09/15 a las 08:11, Evgeny Antyshev escribió: > On 01.09.2015 12:28, Evgeny Antyshev wrote: >> Hello! >> >> This letter I address to those third-party CI maintainers who needs >> to amend >> the upstream devstack-gate to satisfy their environment. >> >> Some folks that I know use inline patching at job level, >> some make private forks of devstack-gate (I even saw one on github). >> There have been a few improvements to devstack-gate, which made it >> easier to use it >> downstream, f.e. introducing DEVSTACK_LOCAL_CONFIG >> (https://review.openstack.org/145321) >> >> We particularly need it to recognize our rhel-based distribution as a >> Fedora OS. >> We cannot define it explicitly in is_fedora() as it is not officially >> supported upstream, >> but we can introduce the variable DEVSTACK_GATE_IS_FEDORA which makes >> is_fedora() agnostic to distributions and to succeed if run on an >> undefined OS. >> >> Here is the change: https://review.openstack.org/215029 >> I welcome everyone interested in the matter >> to tell us if we do it right or not, and to review the change. >> > Prepending with [infra] tag to draw more attention > Personally I think that would be great, as it would greatly help finding Fedora-ish issues with devstack, which are now only being raised by developers due to the lack of a gate.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev