Henry, I've applied the -2 (for Feature Freeze) to a bunch of patchsets, I think I excluded your testing ones, but if the testing ones got -2'd please let me know so I can remove the -2.
--Morgan On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Henry Nash <hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Great, thanks. > > Henry > > On 4 Sep 2015, at 09:17, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > > > Morgan Fainberg wrote: > >> > >>> I would like to request an FFE for the remaining two patches that > >>> are already in review > >>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153897/ and > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154485/). > >>> These contain only test code and no functional changes, and > >>> increase our test coverage - as well as enable other items to be > >>> re-use the list_role_assignment backend method. > >>> > >>> Do we need a FFE for changes to tests? > >>> > >> > >> I would say "no". > > > > Right. Extra tests (or extra docs for that matter) don't count as a > > "feature" for the freeze. In particular it doesn't change the behavior > > of the software or invalidate testing that may have been conducted. > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev