On 9 September 2015 at 22:22, Alan Pevec <ape...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd like to add in a lower-constraints.txt set of pins and actually >> start reporting on whether our lower bounds *work*. > > Do you have a spec in progress for lower-constraints.txt? > It should help catch issues like https://review.openstack.org/221267 > There are also lots of entries in global-requirements without minimum > version set while they should: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst#n226
Not yet. Got some other fish to fry first :) - but I'd certainly be happy to review a spec if someone else wants to work on lower-constraints testing. So the bare library thing - I think that advice is overly prescriptive. Certainly with something like testtools, a bare version is bad - its a mature library and older versions certainly aren't relevant today. OTOH with something like os-brick, brand new, all versions may well be ok. Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
