On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:06:31AM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is > python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin. > > With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden > on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who have been > working on the client code for a while when it was only part of RDO > are not TripleO core reviewers. > > I think we could help with the additional burden of reviews if we made > two of those people core on python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common > now. > > Specifically, the folks I'm proposing are: > Brad P. Crochet <[email protected]> > Dougal Matthews <[email protected]>
+1 to both! > The options I see are: > - keep just 1 tripleo acl, and add additional folks there, with a good > faith agreement not to +/-2,+A code that is not from the 2 client > repos. +1, as others have mentioned I think a common-sense agreement here will be fine :) Steve __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
